Friday, November 26, 2010

Daimon

In reading all those daimon links (and get the eff with it, spell-checker; that little red line under 'daimon' is beyond annoying) I posted a couple weeks back it really strikes me how distant it all seems. Especially the blog Demon Muse, where the author never quite seems to get around to talking about his own Muse. I mean, not that I don't understand a certain reluctance (and to be fair, I still haven't gotten through all the posts there, as there are an awful lot of them), and how the desire to not appear crazy can keep one speaking of the Muse or daimon in abstract or psychological terms. Still, I am tempted to whisper, Coward! (I know, pot, meet kettle.)

My experience with my daimon has been immediate, present, and profound. Like I said, he is right here, right now, smiling at me again out of those blue eyes, probably because I'm talking about him. No, that's not quite right, really; it's more that in talking about him I am talking about my authentic Self.

And not just because I'm opening up and discussing a subject that, well, if it is not exactly taboo, is still not generally mentioned, as it is unusual and often harshly judged (as well as a private matter), but because that is one of the daimon's roles: helping a woman to discover, to uncover, her authentic Self.

What am I talking about, I can hear you all wonder. Well, let's turn to the very excellent Caitlín Matthews and her book In Search of Woman's Passionate Soul: Revealing the Daimon Lover Within. She says:

[The daimon] is the inner inspirer of women: one who appears in male shape in their dreams, fantasies and meditations and plays a significant part in guiding and shaping their outer lives.

The soul of every human being is encoded with an image of desire. In men, the image usually appears as female; in women, as male. Throughout adolescence, the influence of this image intensifies like a burning glass, heightening sexual desire. In later years, this image exercises a strong influence in many areas of life when its features and characteristics are sought in sexual partners, in intellectual colleagues, in objects of spiritual veneration, and in creative inspiration and artistic fulfillment.

In the classical world, the word daimon was used to mean 'the inspirational spirit-companion or genius of a human being'. Similar to the Roman genius, the daimon was the spirit which was believed to be present at one's birth and which guided and protected one's soul. (From pages 2-3.)


She also says '[t]he role of the daimon and muse is to support, companion and guide the authentic self' (page 48).

Now the Muse (or daimon; I consider them the same thing, though of course the sex of one's 'image of desire' is going to depend on which sex one desires!) is often spoken of solely in terms of inspiring creativity; it seems to me that much of the time the sexual aspect is downplayed or ignored, sort of automatically assumed to be sublimated into something 'higher'. But in my experience it is all the same thing, inspiration, desire, longing, the urge to create, to explore: all expressions of the life-force, or libido if you will. Then again I'm also Pagan down to the deep bones of me.

So, then, if you are interested in exploring all this, how do you find him? (And please forgive me, lesbians and bi women, as I generalize the pronouns to masculine.)

He is the go-between, the messenger, between this world and the Other; or between the conscious and unconscious, if you prefer those terms. He comes in dreams, in visions and in meditations; divination (the process of seeing the divine, literally 'to be inspired by a God') such as Tarot reading is also a good way to open up a dialogue with him. He is the Soul Guide, the Psychopomp, and in my dreams at least he has opened doors, held the keys, bought tickets.

He always has a charge to him—he is the image of desire; how can he not? And that charge is how you know it's him. Now, depending on where you are in your acceptance of him, or where you are in your acceptance of your Self, more like, or, to put it another way, how well you are aligned with your own Soul's purpose or calling, he can come in positive or negative guises. If you are not listening to your Soul, he may very well come as an irresistible and unstoppable vampiric sort (and I suspect this is in large part what this society's obsession with vampires taps into); if you are working in accordance with your true Self, he may be a beautiful and fascinating lover. But the charge is always there, and he is always a profoundly compelling figure. Because he embodies, and brings, the call of the Soul.

Now I am personally very very very very lucky in that I seem to have such a clear connection to mine; even within a dream I know it's him. And part of all this, why I'm writing about this now in public (besides the feeling that if I held it in any longer I was just going to burst) is an almost evangelical fervor to share, much as I really dislike the 'spreading the good word' kind of thing. But I have found this working to be incredibly, unbelievably, helpful and profoundly healing and strengthening, as well as deeply compassionate and kind; and it has made me a much, much better person. I also do think it is something that, well, all humans have in common. I make that statement with some trepidation, as I do not wish to speak for anyone else; but coming from a psychological (okay, Jungian, perspective), if the shadow, and the animus and anima, and all the archetypes out there are common to humanity, then so is this.

Does this strike a chord in you?

16 comments:

Vivienne Grainger said...

I've always been curious as to why my Muse is female. She's quite adamant about that, which is all the more puzzling in that in three-score years (and a bit) of life, I've been attracted physically to another woman exactly once. Should I fantasize about a sex partner, he is invariably male.

... and she sits on my shoulder, saying, "Neener neener neener, if you needed to know I'd tell you!"

Debra She Who Seeks said...

The idea of a "Shadow Daimon" explains a lot. Vampires, werewolves, Mormon authors -- a murky brew.

submerina said...

Several chords struck!

_I_ am so grateful that you are explaining the very real relationship you have, rather than a more impersonal, psychological "concept". The writer of Demon Muse seems to feel the same way - the daimon is real, not imagined - but his writing feels... detached. He gets close to something personal and then veers away.

Vivienne - a few weeks ago I was sure my muse was male, but she let me know differently! I have a whole host of them, with my daimon as the ringmaster. My primary muse seems to share something of yours' in personality :)

Matt Cardin said...

Just chiming in to say that I've enjoyed your posts about this subject, Thalia. Very nicely done.

Apologies if my approach at Demon Muse seems a bit too distanced and/or theoretical at times. While I do talk sometimes about my personal relationship with my muse/daimon -- e.g., http://www.demonmuse.com/a-brief-history-of-the-daimon-and-the-genius -- I know exactly what you mean, and I certainly understand why my angle on the whole thing isn't to everybody's taste. Chalk it up to the lifelong path I've walked along the razor's edge between personal immersion and abstract theorizing, between experiencing and speaking what's true for me and drawing out the intersubjective meanings of it all. This dynamic tension is actually a pointedly daimonic thing in itself, since it's involuntary and overwhelming. I channeled it directly into my new book, Dark Awakenings, which is part supernatural horror stories and part academic essays -- only the line between fiction and nonfiction isn't at all solid. Just when I get used to my daimon speaking like a scholar, it/he/she transitions to fiction and metaphor, and then laughs and doles out another wave of energy and inspiration as I struggle to keep up and keep track of which mode is currently glowing hot.

So maybe this is all by way of responding directly to your concern -- which wasn't at all what I thought I was about when I felt the urge to comment here. More muse-ish leadings. In any event, thank you again for your engaging posts.

sarah said...

I found this post through a comment at someone else's weblog - I'm so pleased I did. It's wonderful to see someone else writing openly about this subject.

My daimon is a hugely inspiring person in my life. I love him just as much as if he was sitting on the couch next to me. I would rave on, but am shy of discussing it in public. Thank you for your fabulous post, I am now off to visit the rest of your blog.

mel said...

i came via elsewhere as well...

my daimon (or daemon, as i spell him) comes to me often now...for a long while i was denying my creative life and he was a bedraggled, half-starved street urchin -- and very much afraid of me for continually rejecting him.

happy to say...we're working it out...;)

many thanks and blessings...

~m

theviolethourmusings said...

Hit this link about a very interesting insight by Marion Woodman into the daimon-lover representing a malignant father-daughter complex.
http://books.google.com.au/books?id=Tqckd8cMBmQC&pg=PA109&lpg=PA109&dq=the+daimon+lover&source=bl&ots=xiRvFJcUfn&sig=VfqyJ65roQiIsf6ADUm3rtRutCY&hl=en&ei=y7X0TNfxB4zWvQOt1sXbCA&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=2&ved=0CCEQ6AEwAQ#v=onepage&q=the%20daimon%20lover&f=false

Thalia said...

I hit that link but I couldn't get to an actual preview of that book; and further googling didn't get me any further than this half-quote:

"The daimon lover functions as an inner seducer and stands between [the woman] and any real man in the outer world. Says Woodman: at the core of that father..."

Which doesn't really help much. I suppose I shouldn't judge just on that first sentence (which is Donald Kalsched anyway), but, that sounds awfully dismissive.

theviolethourmusings said...

What Marion Woodman writes is way more visceral. Have transcribed it over to my blog, so scurry over and have a read.
http://theviolethourmuse.wordpress.com

submerina said...

Thalia, maybe this will work.
What's confusing is that the same author seems to view the daimon as a positive influence in a passage from another of her books.

I think that, like anything, there's a light and a shadow side. It's up to the individual to use or abuse what is presented to them. As well, I think an important distinction is missed when going into the psychology of it: Those of us who view the daimon as an actual being, and those who view it as merely an internal construct. Agnostics vs believers ;)

I see it a lot in the reviews on Amazon for books delaing with the subject; remarks about the author "expecting us to believe the daimon exists in reality" and phrases to that effect.

submerina said...

For what it's worth, there is a distinct difference between my animus (as it appears in my dreams), my inner critic and my daimon. Maybe psychologically they all come from the same place, but their actions, demeanour, effect on me is miles apart.

My daimon is aiding me in becoming _closer_ to The Man, rather than separating me, because he is helping me find the parts of myself I hid away.

Thalia said...

Submerina, what do you mean by 'The Man'?

I find that my daimon has multiple roles: soul guide (the Psychopomp of myth), male to my (het) female, Muse and inspirer, guardian angel (not that I'm that big on angels, but it fits the Gabriel stuff now doesn't it?)

I don't know about 'animus' for me. I personally don't like the word, as it's also a word for 'hatred' and there's nothing further from my experience of him. But he certainly has helped me retrieve stuff that's been cast off or rejected and thrown on that big heap in the dark. So, he's also a bridge between the dark and the light, unconscious and conscious.

I don't know if that's anything to do with my being such an introvert; in real life I make friends slowly but deeply, and I have very few. And I mean really seriously introverted--for as long as I've been taking those Myers-Brigg personality tests, several years now, I've been consistently pinning out at 98-100% introverted tendencies (also ISFP, if anyone wants to know). I really should be living in a cave somewhere.

So maybe that's why he's so many things at once for me, but not for others.

Thalia said...

Well crap. Blogger's being buggy tonight (and last night too come to think of it) and it just deleted this lovely long comment of mine. Piss off blogger.

Let me think again, oh grumble grumble.

Having scurried over to violethourmusings blog I did get to read the excerpt (I still can't get any of those links to work; I always just get to the first page telling me 'no preview available', even when I'm signed in) and I have to say I'm not impressed. Though I don't really have the tools, education, or language to engage it on its own terms, as I am not a grad student in psychology. But my gut instinct it that it is bullshit. To be blunt. :)

And I don't think that's just my defenses talking, either; I've gotten pretty good at recognizing those and then letting them pass through me so I can get to the real stuff underneath. I am impatient that way.

What's weird is that the poetry in her other book (which I could access just fine incidentally) absolutely accords with my own experience. But it certainly looks contradictory to the excerpt, doesn't it? Though I suppose she could be being misinterpreted, too. Or is it the difference between early writing and later writing? I mean I hardly have anything to judge her on, so I'm sure that's all perfectly unfair. Anyway.

The internal construct idea is awfully limiting, isn't it? That pretty much relegates mystical experience to a flood of chemicals in the brain or somesuch. Not that that's exactly what's being said here.

Though I'm coming to think it's all just ways of describing the same thing, which is, at the heart of it indescribable, as it is a matter of the soul. Psychological/spiritual, inner/outer, within/without, archetype/God, it's all the same thing at the root. So someone's been telling me. :)

Thalia said...

Also, welcome Sarah and Mel!

Thalia said...

Also, by any reasonable or sane definition of things this relationship with my daimon has proved to be so healthy and helpful. Through it I am more myself, my authentic self; my voice is stronger and more mine, I have become more independent, more engaged in the 'real' world; less afraid to be myself; more liable to detect (and call) bullshit on things, and to get things done. This is all good, and all very healthy. And our relationship is in itself deeply healthy, and is providing a model of what that actually looks like in the world. In practical, worldly terms it has been nothing but good.

submerina said...

Oops, sorry! I forget not everyone has a hotline into my head :) The Man is my husband (I'm not overly fond of the assumptions and connotations that go with that word). I hear you on living in a cave; I would like nothing more (INTP). Like the idea of him as a "bridge", both between the inside parts and between (you) and the world.